Breast Revision Before & After Pictures of Patient 40

Back | Photo Gallery Home

Case Number: 40

Back to Category


Previous Case Next Case
Breast Revision Before Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard   Breast Revision After Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard
Before   After

Click below for other views of this patient


Breast Revision Before Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard
Before

Breast Revision After Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard
After


This 51-year-old woman from Virginia Beach had gel implants placed in the 1980s.  She has been very happy with the results until the past year when she noticed the left breast appeared smaller.  It also became somewhat more firm.  An MRI scan revealed both implants were ruptured.  Because there was some hardening of the left breast and the possibility of capsule contracture, we decided to place new implants in a fresh pocket called a neo-subpectoral pocket.  I would still be placing her implants under the muscle but above the old capsule that went around her implant. Through an incision beneath the breasts, the old implants were removed along with as much gel as could be removed. The pocket that contained the old implants was closed off and new implants were placed above the old pocket but still under the muscle in a brand new pocket.  Her old implant size was 320 cc and we replaced them with 550 cc gel implants.  Although high profile, they give her the right dimensions for her breast width with results that are very soft.   This type of revision breast surgery requires very detailed planning and discussion with an experienced breast surgeon. 

Surgeon: Dr. Thomas Hubbard
Patient Age: 51
Patient Gender: Female
Implant Wall: Smooth Wall
Implant Placement: Submuscular
Implant Contents: Semi-Solid Silicone Gel
Implant Shape: Round
Breast Incision Type: Inframammary

Share

Print This PageEmail this Page

If you like the results you see here, request a consultation to learn more about how this procedure can help you achieve your ideal appearance. We encourage you to print your favorite photos and bring them with you during your consultation to help communicate your goals and expectations.

Keep in mind that each patient is unique and results will vary. These photos are of an actual patient of our practice who has provided consent to display their pictures online.


Previous Case Next Case

Before

After

Case 40

  • Breast Revision Before Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard Breast Revision After Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard
  • Breast Revision Before Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard Breast Revision After Photo | Virginia Beach, VA | Dr. Thomas Hubbard

This 51-year-old woman from Virginia Beach had gel implants placed in the 1980s.  She has been very happy with the results until the past year when she noticed the left breast appeared smaller.  It also became somewhat more firm.  An MRI scan revealed both implants were ruptured.  Because there was some hardening of the left breast and the possibility of capsule contracture, we decided to place new implants in a fresh pocket called a neo-subpectoral pocket.  I would still be placing her implants under the muscle but above the old capsule that went around her implant. Through an incision beneath the breasts, the old implants were removed along with as much gel as could be removed. The pocket that contained the old implants was closed off and new implants were placed above the old pocket but still under the muscle in a brand new pocket.  Her old implant size was 320 cc and we replaced them with 550 cc gel implants.  Although high profile, they give her the right dimensions for her breast width with results that are very soft.   This type of revision breast surgery requires very detailed planning and discussion with an experienced breast surgeon. 

Surgeon: Dr. Thomas Hubbard
Patient Age: 51
Patient Gender: Female
Implant Wall: Smooth Wall
Implant Placement: Submuscular
Implant Contents: Semi-Solid Silicone Gel
Implant Shape: Round
Breast Incision Type: Inframammary